Editors: This is the second part of “Establishing Technology Incubators in Pakistan.” The first part can be read here.

As part of our efforts to try and develop a “Do-It-Yourself” incubation center in Pakistan, we’ve set up Allied Incorporated as our first pilot project. We began operations on January 1st, 2010 out of Lahore. Allied Inc. (as we call it) is run as a not-for-profit. Our objective is to inspire, train and facilitate entrepreneurs – both inside Pakistan and abroad (when they want development teams in Pakistan).  Through this process, we hope to develop and refine a practical model for encouraging entrepreneurship within organizations, across the industry and in the society at large. In this article, I hope to document and share our model, so the model can be improved and perhaps even replicated in smaller, under-served cities.P2_MO_BlockQuote

We envision a 3-step process for new entrants:

1. Inspire: Inspiration is usually the first step in the transformation into entrepreneurship. It is also the fuel that picks us up on days when things are not going so well. I recall reading the story of Shabeer Bhatia (founder of Hotmail) and how he built a $400M company in less than a year with no prior experience of running a company or even managing a team. This was bigger than the budget of most of the cities in Pakistan and how much good it could do. You don’t need to look too far to see that there is amazing content already available online for this purpose. To name a few examples:

  • PASHA is going great work in collaboration with CIO Pakistan to develop a series of interviews with key players in the IT space in Pakistan
  • Stanford and MIT have great entrepreneurial content
  • Forums like greenwhite.org are cropping up as online communities to discuss startups

2. Educate: Once an individual decides to start a business, he is usually met with the realization that he doesn’t know how to proceed. For young fresh graduates, the gaps are huge. For experienced individuals, gaps lie in the financial management and sales and marketing side. Our training focus thus is:

  1. Business Management content with an entrepreneurial focus: This would be content for someone who has several years of technology experience and now wants to move to a technology entrepreneurial role. These include basic finance and sales and marketing skills.
  2. Technical training content required for a startup: This would be focused on last mile technology content that a typical university grad can take and be ready to work in the industry

Though there are many other things that one feels are lacking in resources available out there, we need to be careful what to adopt into a self-funded incubation model since each of these areas requires a huge effort in collecting content, refining it, and keeping it up to date. Our plan on the training side is to develop an online collaborative knowledge base for the industry. We have solicited content from companies in the local industry that specialize in a certain field and are in the process of consolidating and publishing that content. You can find an alpha version of the knowledge base here. Once we have enough content collected and organized, the plan is to start the delivery phase where we will start exploring other forms of delivery for this content (e.g. in-person delivery, video link-based off-site delivery for remote locations, etc.)

3. Facilitate:  Once an individual feels they are ready to take the plunge and start a business, we aim to provide additional facilities. We want to provide a physical forum where entrepreneurs can be around others bitten by the same bug. This is perhaps the most natural way to provide both guidance on things they are doing wrong, and validation of things they are doing right. At the moment we have a small rented office space which entrepreneurs can choose to work in and pay by the seat. The incubator take on the administrative hassle (e.g. power backup, internet connectivity…) allowing new companies to focus on what they’re trying to do. You can find a detailed list of services provided on our site.

Canned Business template #1 – IT Consulting

Since most of the founding team of Allied Inc. are IT professionals, our first template for businesses has been centered around the IT industry. This, we feel can fairly easily be extended to the engineering sector in general.  Most of our participants, so far have been 30-somethings that have significant experience in the outsourcing IT industry and are fairly well aware of the risks they are taking. So far, we haven’t been able to attract fresh graduates with mature ideas but that is something we hope will come as we “templatize” our processes further.

The business model is that of a typical offshore IT outsourcing firm. Target markets are the US and the EU. In particular, we focus on the entrepreneurial sector in these markets due to the ease of access to this sector directly from offshore. The fact that the IT offshoring business is considered a well-known, run of the mill activity is good for us since it provides a lower risk trajectory for tentative entrepreneurs and allows us to focus on the incubation more than the consulting.

Compared to a typical consulting firm, ours is different in a few noteworthy ways listed here. Most notable, however, is that we aim to increase the level of ownership in participants. Ownership of tasks, their consequences and thus the individuals destiny in general. Academic research details five factors that influence the perception of ownership in people in an organizational setting (listed in order of importance):

  1. Fairness
  2. Community
  3. Participation
  4. Financial Payoff
  5. Influence

Within Allied we’ve tried to implement these principles using the following policies:

  1. All policy making is based on a shared vision of fairness. We define fair as values of greatest combined mutual interest.
  2. All employees have open access to information. This includes details of revenue and expenditure.
  3. Consultants get paid what the clients pay for them (minus overheads). Since Allied Inc. aims for no profit, this leads to great value for both the employees and their consultants. Details of this here.
  4. All employees are free to experiment in their free time and are open to solicit other companies and customers for business. If they succeed in bringing in business, they are free to setup their own teams or businesses the way they see fit. This is quite unlike conventional IT units in Pakistan where this attitude is actively discouraged.
  5. We present no grand plans or strategies for the future. Our growth will come ecologically depending on what the employees of the companies are most excited about. There are no grand plans or long term strategies. We encourage constant experimentation with delivery and sales models, guided by the training options available internally.

[Note: To give credit where it’s due, most of these ideas are derived from Dr. J. s's story of how he started Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). The company was started in 1969 with total revenue of $250,000. By 1990, they had $1B in revenues, which grew to $8B in 2006. Our operating philosophy derives heavily from the guiding principles of SAIC.]

Challenges (so far…)

  • Slow decision making: Given the collaborative and democratized nature of our decision making process, it is slow. We need to spend a lot of time developing consensus and doing due diligence on a lot of issues. This is almost always slower than a ‘saith’ making spot decisions and at times speed of making decisions matters more than making the absolute right choice.
  • People issues
    • Skepticism: Amazingly, we have had a lot of resistance from people in accepting the idea of a not-for-profit firm. Most of our clients show skepticism on the validity of our claim. More surprisingly perhaps, hiring new talent is even harder. We get the “what are you getting from all this then” question a lot. This is, however, natural since few, if any, references are available for people both here and abroad. P2_MO2_BlockQuote
    • Behavioral Inertia: Another related issue is the lack of people who are willing to take responsibility. Most of our hires are senior people with 7 or 8 years of experience in the local services industry. During that time, they have been groomed to take as little ownership as possible, and to participate only when absolutely necessary. They have been convinced that doing better will not necessarily lead to better reward. We’ve found that this re-adjustment process takes a while to sink in for most people.
    • Strange definition of risk: People in Pakistan have a strange definition of risk. I once interviewed a person who told me that ours was a small setup and it was a big risk for him to join us because he wouldn’t know how long we’d last. I offered to give him a few months advance salary and extended notice periods for termination but he wasn’t very interested. I asked him how much guarantee he had from his current employer and if he knew how well that company was doing internally. I asked him if his current employer had a million dollars in reserve but chose to shut the company down anyways, would he have any control over it. He got the point, but he still didn’t join us!
    • Impatience: Being young, full of ideas and having an entrepreneurial flame burning in you is a really bad combination! Many times our level of patience for results is that of a hungry two year old in front of candy. This is, however, a happy problem. We would rather have people too eager for change than those who have given up on it.
  • Lack of guidance: One of our major issues is not having a reference business model for incubation and in particular non-profit/cooperative consulting firms. There are few of these out there in the world and even fewer that are openly documented for references. Hence a lot of our learning on incubation is experience-based.
  • Making the training unit break-even: One of our key challenges on the training front is monetizing the effort required to build and maintain the training portal initially. Although technology training remains a major hurdle for the growth of the local industry, most companies are not willing to act on it. Our attempts to form an industry-wide fund to develop the training portal have so far met with stalling tactics. This lack of funding has made the training development slow and stuck in a chicken-and-egg situation.
  • Avoiding external funding: Since one of our basic objectives was to setup an incubation unit that a small community itself can develop, we adopted a basic policy of no external funding. All the capital expenditure is made by the employees themselves. This has the positive side of increasing the ownership level of people but making inventory management and accounting all the more complex. It also challenges us to create aggressive growth since some of that (especially in the services industry) is heavy on capital investment when growth kicks off.
  • Making the companies break-even: Being a small company, the biggest challenge of course is always to make ends meet at the end of the day. With all the energy spent on the incubation and consensus building process, there are days when there is little time for the things that actually bring in money. A lot of this has to do with the fact that we are in early stages and systems and processes are being streamlined. However, our biggest challenge remains stabilizing our sales and delivery units. Only that will enable us to survive long enough to call this a success.
  • Creativity and innovation: Understandably our business models are designed to be low risk, predictable stepping stones into entrepreneurship. This, by design, moves away from riskier, highly creative ideas. Our thesis here is that if you have enough free people (financially free and free in thinking) in close proximity, creativity and innovation will occur naturally. While innovation and creativity are not out immediate focus areas, we want to be able to assist people in that to whatever extent possible.


As a percentage, too many of our youth are groomed to become docile, white collar employees and to suppress their ideas for ‘practical reasons.’ In the long run, this is bad for the nation and the people. Allied Inc. is our attempt to try and change that and develop nurseries of entrepreneurship in Pakistan; to develop a mindset that looks at problems as opportunities but with a realistic, long term lens. These are still early days for us and we have a long way to go to prove our point. Our biggest challenge is perhaps to survive long enough for us to bring about perceptible change.

If you feel you can assist us in any way or if you have ideas on how we can do things better, please share your feedback with me at momer(at)alliedc.com. Our website is located at www.alliedc.com where you can find details of our specific IT offerings. A special thanks to Ali Bin Jamil for his support in the effort so far.

11 Responses to “Establishing Technology Incubators in Pakistan: Part 2/2”

  1. What exactly are the responsibilities of the employees you hire at Allied Inc.?

  2. Omer says:

    Employees are split into three categories described here:

    Employees can choose (and later change) their category based on their risk appetite, skill, confidence etc. The idea is to not make it an all-in or all-out choice, rather to incentivise entreprenurial behavior. The more responsibilities they take, the more financial reward, control and independence they get.

  3. Call me old schooled or what. I am still unable to understand what you do. If you “train” entrepreneurs, what does a typical hire do?

    And when somebody wants to become a PnL owner in your organization (by the way what is PnL in a non-profit organization), is he free to choose whatever he wants to sell and make money from? Aren’t there some ‘specialization’ areas?

    • Omer says:

      We are an incubator. Incubators facilitate entreprenuers and help them get the resources they need (training bieng one resource).
      Allied Inc. is a non-profit. P&Ls within it make a profit. We arent asking people to become entrepreneurs and start businessess that dont make money. They are free to choose what to make and how to sell it.
      As I mentioned in an article, the idea is to not have a grand plan and TELL them what to specialize in.. the idea is that if the people in the organization enjoy what they are doing, growth in that direction will follow (might be wrong, but thats the thesis here)

      • Anonymous says:

        hi..i am arsalan and i am a student of architecture in Mehran University jamshoro.. I’ve read your article its very good actually i am in final year and working on thesis project which is based on
        INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN PAKISTAN and my building component is a (INCUBATION PARK AT KARACHI)…so i’ve some question about this time and with the reference of your arcticle i found that it shall be very helpful to have your guide upon this project..hope you wil cooperate with me..i am waiting for ur response..thanks:)

  4. Affan Syed says:

    I appreciated your last article, but I had hoped this one would have brought more clarity in terms of exactly what you provide to new entrepreneurs.

    Let me rephrase it; if I wanted to start a new outsourcing company, and already had some contact in US, what would joining your company bring me that I could not do my self. Seed funding (unlikely given that your are NFP)? expertise in …..? What exactly is the template that I will get.

    Getting these questions cleared would be paramount, because frankly to most people, including me, incubator becomes a buzz word and we need some tangible points beyond that to fully capture the idea behind your company.

  5. Omer says:

    http://www.alliedc.com/blog/?p=81 – this is our version of the article and it describes in detail the services we’re currently providing. Table in the middle was removed from this article because the editors felt it wasnt appropriate for this forum.
    What we’re offering isnt radical but the idea is if you have lots of these spread over the country, then you can have a direct injection of capital into smaller town and cities (where its needed most).
    Let me flip the question. If you already have a contact in the US, whats keeping you from starting a company and enabling other people?

  6. Ishaq says:

    Have you looked at the Saif Center by Dr. Umar Saif? For me that is an example of what one can do in a country like Pakistan to incubate startups. Take a look at http://www.saifcenter.com — way to go ..

    • Omer says:

      Yes, the omer innovation center is quite good. I think we need a lot more of these. For a country like ours, we need 100s of these centers. My take is that for that to happen two things need to happen (which are a little hard to replicate in teh said innnovation center model):
      1. Theirs is not a setup that is self funded. Their premesis for e.g. is a building owned by Omer’s father and is probably worth 200k / month just in rent. This is hard to replicate in smaller towns. We’re aiming for something that’s self-funded.
      2. I think they are focused on innovation more than entreprenuership. My thesis is that to encourage entrepreneurs one should also focus on lower risk services/outsourcing type work. New products are great but (unlike Omer Saif) I feel that innovation is a **consequence of well of entrepreneurs getting together rather than something that one should aim for

      They are doing great work though. I think we need lots more of all kinds of entreprenuers

  7. M. Uzair Sukhera says:

    Found this link very interesting:

    You can use it to explain ur idea of incubators… I really like your idea btw!


  • STEP aspires to be the central place for discussion on improving the state of Science, Technology, and Education in Pakistan. Read More
  • To learn how you can contribute, click here
  • Never miss a new article! Choose your favorite method to stay up to date with STEP

Recent Comments